First, a little bit about National Geographic and its friends.
National Geographic, whose “Green” building was awarded in 2004 by Gorbachev’s Green Cross International Environmental foundation, has funded and supported men like Jacques Yves Cousteau, worshipper of the sea and preacher to mankind who once said:
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day.”
Charming. He also proclaimed that
“The real cure for our environmental problems is to understand that our job is to salvage Mother Nature. We are facing a formidable enemy in this field. It is the hunters... and to convince them to leave their guns on the wall is going to be very difficult.”
Jane Goodall is another National Geographic -sponsored environmentalist who is not love with the sea, like Cousteau, but has a great deal of deep feelings for the chimpanzee:
Chimpanzees have given me so much. The long hours spent with them in the forest have enriched my life beyond measure. What I have learned from them has shaped my understanding of human behavior, of our place in nature.
Incidentally, Goodall is a patron saint of the Optimum Population Trust, a U.K. group that concerns itself with population growth issues, climate change and biodiversity. Probably the organization’s most infamous excretion was their public announcement that children are “bad for the planet”. They are more a septic tank than they are a thinking one.
Environmentalists like Cousteau and Goodall use their interpretation of nature and their so-called “love” for it as a sheath by which to conceal their true motives. To the general public, they appear on wildlife shows and they speak in iambic pentameter about their love for animals and their awe for the beauty of the earth. The sheeple stand in awe of their awe and regard the environmentalists as the ultimate expression of love on the planet. Now, if anyone even suggests that they don’t agree with the environmentalists about the sanctity of life, about global warming, about Al Gore’s IQ, they will be accused of being hate mongers and killers of the earth.
However, the environmentalists’ true motives are not born of any kind of love whatsoever. On the contrary, they are born out of a distinct hatred for the human being coupled with a lust for power that goes beyond that which most people are able to recognize. These self-ordained priests of pantheism generally see mankind as a creature that goes against their sacred earth, their Gaia, their personal ideals.
For example, look at Dr. Phillip S. Chua and his howling at the moon:
Our planet would be at an imminent grave risk of being destroyed, if Global Warming, more appropriately termed Climate Change, continues unabated. And like the multitudes of problems threatening the world, this major one is caused by its intelligent inhabitant, man himself, and his careless and irresponsible behavior, especially in the last two hundred some years. Human beings are not new to self-abuse, self-destruction, and to irreverence to his environment, in spite of their education, culture, and massive data in this age of exploding informational technology and mind-boggling advances in science and medicine. - Dr. Chua
These guys and gals are a dime a dozen. They all spout the same claptrap ad nauseum. They even have Hollywood idiots sniffing their behinds and wagging their green little tails. Who knows why these people are the way they are. Beat up in high school? Spoiled and coddled overmuch by their parents? They want to get even with Johnny who made fun of them on the school bus? Who knows. Who cares.
Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, is another devil that is honored today by the idiot sheeple and their masters. She was a eugenicist and a racist pure and simple. Check out this video to see how the Smugsonian Institute honored this despicable creature of a woman:
”Eugenics: belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, esp. by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having a genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits.
Goodall, like Sangar, announced her mission to create a world. This is how ARROGANT these people are. They believe they are gods.
My mission is to create a world where we can live in harmony with nature.
Now I am of the belief that mankind is made in the image of God who ALREADY create the GOOD world, even though His good is NOT in the image of environmentalists, who teach that we ought to learn our life lessons from the beasts of the earth instead of God Himself and the Ten Commandments.
Now what is the religion today that most vociferously supports the man-is-beast thesis? That would be of course Satanism. I will leave the rest up to you to research.
The Satanic-funding National Geographic has recently posted a "wholesome" piece called "Mother's Day Mayhem: 5 "Worst" Animal Moms. Notice the quotation marks around the word "Worst" . This is because, as you read the article, its will try to teach you that although these animal mommies either eat their young or allow them to be killed by their siblings, they are not really all that bad because, in the end, these cute little fuzzy mommies care more about the survival of the species, rather than the survival of their own kids. They are much more like Jane Goodall or Margaret Sanger who really CARE about the WORLD.
For each of the five animals there is a section that starts with "Give mom a break because...". This is where NG teaches us how it is actually a good thing that mom kills some of her babies. After all, quality control is a desirable thing.
"One robust offspring is probably better than two weak ones later on," he said, "so the quality control occurs early on when it's cheap—before you've invested lots of resources."
Wow! Eugenics is a not only good for the goddess Earth, it is also good for the ECONOMY!
Remember that sweet little hamster you used to love as a kid? Well he is also a eugenicist who undrestands the economic dangerous of population growth:
Forbes believes hamster moms practice "parental optimism" by creating broods bigger than they may be able to rear.
"They don't know how much food is going to be out there," he said. "They create a litter with a few spare offspring to ensure high-quality young even if [food is scarce] or there are developmental defects in others."
The purpose of this whole piece really hits home with the last line:
As is often the case with apparent neglect among animals, Mom may not be minding the kids, but she does seem to be looking out for the species.
The New World Order has already begun the process of getting us used to the idea that abortion (late term and early term) is a good thing for the SPECIES and that doing so IS NATURAL. They want future mankind to be a numb and loveless drone that could actually kill its own species IF it could be convinced that it is economically or physiologically or psychologically healthy to do so. They also want sheeple to worship nature and the animals. After all, your hamster seems to be better at child rearing than you are right?
The philosophy of the eugenicists and the New World Order fascists is that nature is god and has the last word in regards to what is right and wrong. The State must simply be a reflection of this. This is what is being taught in philosophy departments, either explicitly or implicitly like this sneaking self-satisfied National Geographic hit piece on the anti-abortion movement.
Magazines like NG are simply there to put a happy face on abortion and population control. They are going to continue to pump these ideas into our children until they squeeze every last bit of humanity out of them. If parents are not careful their kids will become victims of this relentless propaganda machine that was created by madmen and people who perceive global warming only because they are colder than ice.